Another "Usual Suspect" Sees His False Allegations Flushed Out By A Wise Federal Judge

In settling the Arizona complaint, GCA agreed to disassociate itself from Sanford. Sanford argued that resulted in the tarnishment of his character and harmed efforts by Sightline to gain gaming licenses.

"To prove that disparagement rises to the level of antitrust violation a plaintiff must show those disparaging representations are clearly false. Sightline makes no such allegation in its complaint," Pro wrote.

For Reference, search this blog for "bunch of zeroes."