Smoking Gun Evidence that Bergeron Case Was Unfounded in Law or Fact

The above email chain dates back to the beginning of the $25 million Xyience lawsuit filed against me in Las Vegas District Court back in 2007 by Attorney Jamie Cogburn. These exchanges came from an email recently sent to me by the brother of Xyience Founder Russell Pike, who is currently incarcerated due to a conviction for tax evasion. I will be publishing a large cache of other insider emails in the near future.

At the time these emails originated, Pike was working feverishly to get more investors to come in to keep Xyience viable. My reports were making those efforts nearly impossible. The lawsuit described investors willing to enter into financing with Xyience, but only if my articles were removed from the Internet. As soon as the case resulted in a preliminary injunction against me, Russell Pike sent a representative out to deliver copies of the injunction order to local investors. This rep wrote the following statement in an affidavit I filed in my counterclaim:

The Fertittas always denied through their attorneys that they had anything to do with the suit against me, but it's obvious from this testimony that they forced Xyience's hand. Dana White didn't end up investing anything, but before Fertitta Enterprises went through with their loan package they did get White's approval.

This email chain will be the main exhibit in a new case against Attorney Cogburn in Nevada. There will be much more to come on this front in the days and weeks ahead. Stay Tuned. 

Xyience Dismisses Claims Against Rich Bergeron; Accepts Summary Judgment on Counterclaim

orderdismissingcaseacceptingclaimxyience

By: Rich Bergeron

It's been a long time, but even a six-year legal battle did not deter me from continuing to report the truth about the history and current operations of Xyience. Today I can look back knowing I finally managed to get the claims against me completely dismissed. Four different judges oversaw the case over those six years, and multiple law firms and attorneys for the opposition.

The above order also allows for a summary judgment request on my counterclaim against Xyience to go unopposed, so it marks the first major judgment on my behalf in any legal action I've ever been involved in. It's all the more impressive since the opposing lawyer admitted the now-dissolved $25 million case against me had no merits.  

Though this order officially releases me from any liability and confirms my efforts to expose the truth, it does not end the litigation entirely. I still have an extensive sanctions motion in play with multiple affidavits supporting that motion. My own affidavit and evidence files explain the whole situation, but after a September 19th, 2013 hearing I can honestly say I don't think that presiding Judge Lloyd King bothered to read any of that content. 

Judge King certainly did not even consider the fact that the judge prior to him (Judge Mike Nakagawa) allowed me to amend the motion for the record. Judge Nakagawa would not allow me to amend a motion which had already been decided, which was the contention of the Fertitta lawyers going into this hearing.

The hearing resulted in an indefensible decision I will appeal to the 9th Circuit. That hastily-made ruling proved Judge King is biased against me to the point of believing everything the opposing lawyers contend, even if it happens to be a lie. Judge King actually made the effort to locate and read out loud an order on the motion before him, and that moment will be a major basis for my appeal. If it was a "senior moment" for the aging federal judge, his capacity to continue in such an important judicial role should be seriously questioned at this stage of his career. 

Now, I'm no law school graduate, but the last time I checked a summary judgment denial is not in the same legal ballpark as a complete claim dismissal. How could any acting federal judge get as far as Judge King has without knowing the difference between those two distinctions? 

Judge King read the decision on a 2008 summary judgment request in my case like it was a smoking gun for the Fertitta lawyers during the September 19th hearing. The motion he referred to is actually the most viewed document I currently have on Docstoc.com and can be accessed HERE. The Fertitta lawyers also tried to represent at the September 19th hearing that the same motion was dismissed on the merits, but the actual dismissal order concludes the dismissal is mandated by technicality, because I did not properly serve the motion on all creditors involved in the bankruptcy. I would have had to file my own bankruptcy petition in order to pay the postage alone on such notifications. I don't have the kind of budget most lawyers and law firms typically bring to the legal process. Everything I do is fueled by extremely minimal financial resources. 

So, Judge King read this order denying summary judgment on my sanctions claims. He read it right out loud in court for the record right after trying to explain that it meant the whole issue had already been litigated and dealt with. Why even have a hearing in the first place if his conclusions were true? If he reviewed the record and came to the decision that the Fertitta lawyers were correct in their false representation of the record, there would not even be any basis for holding the hearing where he made this huge mistake. I immediately corrected him at the hearing, but that only made things worse for me. He continued to betray an overwhelming bias against me along with a willingness to praise and commend the opposing lawyers. He even rejected a legally feasible and logically sound request for a default judgment against all parties who did not answer the claims and did not have any representation at the hearing. 

I gave Judge King multiple chances to hold a more comprehensive hearing when I could physically attend, asking for the hearing on September 19th to be considered a scheduling conference. Instead, he allowed the telephonic appearance to be my final say in the matter, and I had a great deal of issues with the court hanging up on me and not being able to hear me clearly. Judge King couldn't even be bothered to come up with any official legal background for his denial of my claims. He left that up to the main opposing attorney and his law firm. 

Gordon Silver is a high-class Las Vegas law firm, and the main guy they put on this case is a managing partner named Greg Garman. This shark is a well-trained and experienced lawyer with a very esteemed position at his firm and in the legal community. So, how could he really confuse the record himself to the point that he put such incredible misrepresentations in print and then repeated them in open court after I corrected him in my reply brief? The most logical answer is that he was never confused at all and just purposely painted the record in a false light to make his case look like it could be easily dispatched on a technicality instead of actually being examined on the merits. Lawyers seem to love winning legal battles on technicalities. It saves them the trouble of actually defending against or pressing claims based on actual facts and evidence. 

This time, the basis for giving Garman the win on a technicality was completely fabricated. His argument that a technicality existed at all made Judge King look like a fish out of water when he tried to take the bait. 

Once again, the September 19th hearing proved to me that justice is an evil bitch. The judicial system in this country is hopelessly bogged down by patronage, abuse, waste, and incompetence. People like me were not intended to be able to even make it this far into the legal process. I jumped through every hoop my opposition put in front of me, and by some miracle I remain standing more than six years into this extensive litigation that went from an obscure district court claim to a major bankruptcy adversary proceeding. I simply could not make it to this point if I did not have the truth on my side. 

Over time I learned to realize that pointing out serious flaws in the opposition's arguments and legal citations did not mean those points would even register with a judge who came into the process as a biased party. I came to appreciate how twisted the system is when it comes to pro-se (self-represented) parties. I knew at some point only an appeal examined by competent and unbiased federal judges would set the record straight. At this point, Mr. Garman hasn't even filed any order to appeal, but I'm eagerly awaiting the moment when I can actually see what the court's official decision will use for a basis in law. 

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the hearing came in the response to my opening comments (which went largely unheard due to a bad connection). Mr. Garman began his statement by confessing that the Fertitta brothers are already suffering due to my work. He did not get into specifics, but he claimed I was responsible for their recent issues with the Nevada Gaming Control Board. If their trouble with the gaming authorities is my doing, I wonder what else about the Fertittas gaming officials might need to know. I haven't even really investigated Station Casinos as much as I have researched the Fertitta involvement in Xyience.  

Garman's remarks proved to me what I've always known in the back of my mind: courts are far too slow at delivering justice. Real justice comes from the court of public opinion. Exposure of inherent evil is often fatal to its ability to fester and grow out of control. Station Casinos has a history of leaving victims behind as the Fertitta brothers continue to hoard their billions in personal assets. As a gaming licensee in Nevada, these casino barons ought to have a much cleaner background than they currently do. The fact that the Fertittas brought Ultimate Poker into legal status as the first official online poker outfit in the state of Nevada is disturbing when you look at what Fertitta Enterprises is really capable of when it comes to fraud. Their connections to the illegal Full Tilt Poker operation through their ownership of Strikeforce is also egregious considering they should have known the illegal status of online poker when they made decisions to retain their sponsorship agreement with the company when it came under Zuffa control. Even worse, US prosecutors labeled Full Tilt Poker a Ponzi Scheme since the outfit's owners were allegedly pocketing player funds. 

The Station Casinos expansion as a management firm into California casinos governed by Native American tribes is even more troubling under the circumstances. Their indirect financial connections to California senators are telling. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid also has a son named Key Reid who is on the board of directors for the Fertitta-run Meadows Bank. 

It makes sense that even a federal judge would be afraid to rule against people with this kind of power and access. They are virtually untouchable. Still, Judge King also refused to sanction me despite saying in open court that he actually felt I was the one who deserved sanctions. So, basically he admits he is not willing to even rule in favor of what he feels is actually justified. 

The appeal process should be intriguing, but I also plan to report Judge King to the state bar for displaying a complete lack of ability to do even minimal research into the claims he decided so hastily. The most important development at this stage is regarding my long break from working on this site. The litigation process leading up to my departure from Las Vegas was draining and stressful, and I needed a break from all of it. The hearing designation and dismissal of all claims against me opened new doors and brought me back to the heart of the story and the need to expose the real truth here. 

With no legal obstacles, I can now pursue a non-fiction book project on the case. I can also begin to plan out a documentary. At the rate I'm going, such projects will have a better potential to benefit burned Xyience shareholders than any legal action I could possibly undertake. I am also compiling an extensive report to deliver to Nevada, California, and Native American gaming authorities, which could do more to bring the Fertittas to justice than any judge in any court in this land. Someone must show these ruthless robber barons that there is a price to pay for screwing over innocent people and destroying their investments needlessly and thoughtlessly. 

Although I should be disappointed upon losing the decision on the most important motion in my case thus far, I am actually thrilled. My passion for this story is renewed. My prospects for a successful appeal are promising. Judge King's bias was more pronounced than ever at this latest hearing. Over the next few weeks I will be working to revamp this site to include all the relevant information and documentation detailing the irresponsible and corrupt history behind the Fertitta family facade. Stay Tuned for more frequent updates in the days and weeks to come.

EDITOR'S NOTE:

All stories on this site are now free to read with no subscription fee required. I will be spending some time updating broken links on the site in the next few days. This is mostly due to an unfortunate issue with the loss of all customer files hosted on fileden.com. We had a ton of material hosted there that now needs to be relocated to another public server. Some of these files are now hosted HERE. We will make a formal announcement when all bugs are fixed. 

NOT SO "TRUST" WORTHY AFTER ALL (PART 2)

By: Rich Bergeron

David R. Herzog is the Liquidation Trustee for the Xyience, Inc. bankruptcy I am embroiled in out in Las Vegas, Nevada. He and I have had limited personal interaction by email and never met in person. Instead, Herzog left the meeting and conversing up to an assistant of sorts who takes care of all the details in complex cases like the Xyience saga.

Jon Backman (at left) is Herzog's counsel, and so far he's handled much of the grunt work for Herzog regarding the bankruptcy and several adversary cases filed against those who allegedly defrauded the company in past years.

I met with Backman myself this past February, and I shared a great deal of information and evidence with him. He used some of the paperwork I provided him to prosecute his cases against some of the perpetrators who swindled Xyience along the way. We worked well together while it lasted, and as we tried to hammer out a settlement, I provided a few more clues and some important insight. Over time, though, it appeared to me that Backman was stringing me along, promising to take action to help me only to fail to follow up on multiple occasions.

For instance, Backman agreed time and again that the company's initial $25 million case against me should be dismissed, starting with his first contact with me in December of 2009 (CLICK ON IMAGE BELOW TO SEE FULL SIZE):



It should have taken Backman just a few hours time to draw up a motion for dismissal, serve it, file it, and get a hearing. Instead, he apparently did nothing but ignore my case. After a while, I started to understand the reality of the situation and that this guy might not be the kind of champion lawyer he seems to want to pretend to be when he needs something.

I decided I would have to file first to get Backman and Herzog to take me seriously, as Backman insisted the maximum amount Herzog would settle for would be $5,000. Even when I agreed to that amount, though, Backman never showed me as much of a draft of any pleading. He also never provided a draft of any agreement that stipulated our terms or any written timeline for any realization of such a settlement. The communication was all only by email and by phone. Nothing with a signature. It is a prime example of flat out, pure legal delay. Backman and Herzog simply sat on this case like all the lawyers before them did.

THE BEGINNING OF THE END

Eventually, I broke off communication completely with Backman. I told him I was going to block all his email accounts, and I dropped off his radar for a while. Meanwhile I compiled the legal documents it would take to blow this case wide open. During my time formulating these crucial filings, I decided it would be a good time to give Mr. Backman one last opportunity to save face for his own sake and for the estate's benefit. I sent him an email message telling him a few hints about my plans to file new material and offering one last chance for a civil conversation if he wanted to call me. Not long after I sent the message, he called. We compromised yet again (The first settlement was supposed to pay out $5,000 to drop the estate from the counterclaim and the sanctions motion claims), and Backman made another new offer:

Thanks Rich. Have you filed your amended defamation claim? If so, would you email it to me?

Do you want to do a settlement as follows:

1. I pay you $5,000 for the Rule 9011;

2. I dismiss the claims against you;

3. You are allowed to pursue the remaining defamation claim against the company (which I would defend, and perhaps we could settle down the road).

If so, then I would recommend such a resolution to the trustee.


Jon


I accepted these terms, and I made it clear I wanted Backman to move on it as soon as he could. He sent the above email to me on November 4, 2010, and we continued being civil and trying to work things out for almost two more weeks until I began to realize more pressure needed to be applied to get Backman to do anything on my case. I knew I needed to file my latest pleadings and affidavits. So, I sent Backman and Herzog everything by email first, on November 15th, although I didn't have digital copies of the exhibits for the summary judgment motion and had to send those by snail mail.

Here's most of what went out to both Backman and Herzog that day:

Xyience Case Brief in Support of Summary Judgment By Rich Bergeron


Affidavit in Support of Summary Judgment in Bergeron vs. Xyience Bankruptcy Case


Designation of Evidence For Motion For Summary Judgment


Motion For Summary Judgment


Affidavit In Support of Motion to Amend Sanctions Motion in Bergeron vs. Xyience Bankruptcy case


Xyience Case Motion to Amend Rule 9011 Sanctions by Rich Bergeron



I expected at least some kind of backlash from Mr. Backman of course, as much of the pleading material involves descriptions of my frustration with this attorney's behavior in support of fellow attorneys I'm seeking sanctions against. Instead of getting an immediate missive from the man himself, though, I was fortunate enough to get an email meant for him from the guy he was supposed to be representing: Liquidation Trustee David R. Herzog. The intercepted communication, obviously sent to me by accident, apparently never even made it to Backman's inbox. Since it was unrelated to settlement negotiations it is both admissible in court and ripe for publication, so here it is:

Gee Jon, and here I thought you were pursuing all these claims. Oh sorry I forgot, your not nearly the atty that Rich Bergeron believes he is; oh yes he is a legend in his own mind. Here is my concern, how do we get rid of this frivilous garbage without you spending gobs of time. I'm sure he doesn't comply with local rules if they are anything like the Northern District. You always told me he was crackpot, these pleadings prove it.

David

I SHOT RIGHT BACK WITH THIS:


David,

Disrespect will get you nowhere.

You probably didn't realize you sent this to me as well.

This "crackpot" gave your counsel a lot of information and
documentation on Xyience. This information helped win your cases. Mr.
Backman still doesn't even seem to know what my case is all about,
though. Neither do you.

I'm glad you just gave me more evidence that he's defamed me as well.

Not too smucking fart for a guy who's supposed to be a REAL attorney.

Good Day,

Rich

HE RESPONDED LATER (NOTE HIS MIS-SPELLING OF HIS OWN COUNSEL'S NAME) BY WRITING:

Sir,

Making threats to us does not resolve the situation. Bachman has made tremendous efforts in pursuing the litigation against the Fertitas and the other wrongdoers. Your disparaging remarks against him in your pleadings are reprehensible. What more can we do but vigorously pursue this litigation. I apologize to you for calling you a "crackpot" but let him have the peace to do his work undistracted by your litigation.

David Herzog

AFTER A FEW MORE BACK AND FORTH EXCHANGES HERZOG GAVE UP ARGUING:

Rich,

I don't want to bicker with you further, do what you think you need to do.

David

BACKMAN'S THOUGHTS ON THE LIQUIDATION TRUSTEE'S ACCIDENTAL FOOT IN MOUTH EPISODE WERE EVEN MORE REVEALING AND INTRIGUING UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES:

Rich ---

Apparently, David inadvertently sent the email to you when he meant to send it to me. Like I, he is quite distressed by what you have written in your motion to amend the sanction motion, and in the summary judgment counterclaim, both of which will distract my attention from critical matters in the Zyen/Fertitta case. I restrained my tongue because I know that getting into arguments with you about the damage you are doing to the case is pointless. But David was venting his frustration, thinking he was writing to me, but inadvertently sending it to you.

As for your comment that the remarks are slanderous, they are not because David did not publish them to anyone. They went solely to you.

David tells me that you and he exchanged further emails, but I have not seen them, so I can't comment. If you share them with me, then I will do so.


Jon

=====================================

Rich ---

I do not care whether you believe me. I did not receive David's email until you sent it to me. In fact, even when David emailed me to tell me of his error, he did not send me the email he had sent to you. As for Rule 9011, it has nothing to do with an email between an attorney and his client.

That being said, I regret that the events of today have occurred because, as you know, I have attempted to move past fighting with you, and have just accepted that you are going to do what you do --- and say what you say --- regardless of what I say. I did not like either of your motions, but I'll deal with them. There really is nothing for us to discuss about them: you have attacked my integrity, but I am a big boy and can take it. You should do the same with David's email to you and just let it go.

We'll speak soon I'm sure.



Jon

=====================================

Rich ---

I have to run to a meeting, but for the record, I never called you a crackpot. As I have told you, I believe that you are abusing the legal system with some of your pleadings, and I believe that, to some extent, because you are smart and hard-working, but severely misdirected, you can be dangerous. But I do not view you as a crackpot, and would not have used that term in describing you.

We'll speak soon.



Jon


FINALLY, BACKMAN DECIDED TO PLAY HARDBALL AND GIVE ME AN ULTIMATUM (WHICH I REFUSED TO BACK DOWN OR CAVE IN TO), OBVIOUSLY PUTTING HIS AND HERZOG'S OWN SELF-INTERESTS AHEAD OF THE ESTATE'S:

Rich ---

I don't know what you are trying to pull, but there is zero chance that the Trustee would settle your Rule 9011 claims, but let you bring a Rule 9011 motion against us the day after we paid you. We'd have to be out of our minds to do that, because then we'd be paying you $5,000 for nothing. At this point, we have not filed anything in your case, so you have no basis to file a Rule 9011 motion against either of us. In fact, if you did so, then you'd be subject to severe sanctions. And I am not going to file a settlement motion, or anything else, until you have signed an agreement saying that you will not pursue Rule 9011 motions against David or me. That was always the deal, and you know it.

Bottom line, and no further discussion: If you insist on retaining the right to pursue a Rule 9011 motion against the Debtor, the Trust Estate, David or me, then there is no settlement --- period. This is not negotiable. And if you do not accept it by 5:00 p.m. my time this evening, then our discussions are at an end, and we will cease responding to your email or speaking with you any further.



Jon

And now, because Backman and Herzog never volunteered any pleadings or demonstrated any general effort to move this case in any real direction, they use this fact as a sword against me. They claim this means they are not subject to Rule 9011 Sanctions, but they neglect to consider how liable they are for general sanctions. The problem with their backwards logic is I know the law.

The sanctions motion is not strictly a Rule 9011 motion. The motion asks the court to initiate its own ability to sanction offending parties. The pleading asks the court to provide sweeping relief for those injured by the blatant abuses of process and incessant delays wrapped up in the case. Backman and Herzog perpetrated much of the most recent delay, and at this point there is no reason not to name them to the amended motion for sanctions if I am given a chance to amend that motion.


I'LL SEE YOU IN COURT

Well, since I live thousands of miles away from the venue I won't actually see anyone in court, but I will seek a hearing and ask to appear by telephone. At that point there should be another item on the docket describing the events I've shared here. All the attorneys I've faced thus far in my budding pro-se career in law have demonstrated an extreme lack of integrity when backed into a corner. So many lawyers and people who can afford to hire them seem to live on that timeless threat, "I'll see you in court." Most of us who can't afford to engage a lawyer or don't have enough time or energy to become one end up forced to negotiate or backpedal or compromise our own integrity to deal with people who drop this threat on others with impunity.

I couldn't afford any type of legal assistance, and I wasted a lot of time trying to find it when I felt overwhelmed by this case in the early days. I did it myself, and so far that's been the best decision I've made. I don't think I'm the best lawyer on the planet or anywhere close to it. I don't think I'm a better lawyer than Jon Backman or most lawyers in practice in this country.

If I had to give my honest opinion of how good a lawyer I really am, I'd have to say I suck at it. But, then again, I don't want to be a lawyer anyway. I never did want to be one. I was forced to.

The real issue is not what kind of lawyer I am, but what kind of person I am. I'm honest, and painfully so. Some might say this high level of integrity means I could never be a proficient lawyer. Again, I don't mind, because I don't want to be an attorney anyway.

As my own legal representative, I have no attorney/client privilege. I have virtually no chance of being in front of the same judge again on another case. I won't have to face the opposing lawyer in another case, either. I don't have to make deals or play nice or rack up huge fees to fatten my paycheck. The pay is virtually non-existent and highly dependent on a favorable outcome(which has taken me longer than three years to get anywhere close to), but the work is meaningful and the victims are worth fighting for. More than anything the work I do requires a sincere and earnest sacrifice of my time for the benefit of the greater good. I have to be selfless by very nature just to keep doing it without reward or much in the way of sustainable funding. There's no guarantees, no quick fixes, and no great hope of full recovery at this rate. Yet, someone has to step up and try to do this work, anyway, and I don't see anyone else in line waiting to do it for me.

The initial shareholders of this company were swindled out of their investments. Many of them lost college funds, family trusts, and retirement savings as a result. The Fertittas promised to keep the company viable by taking their chief lien position with the help of a "private investment group." Instead, they killed the company, with help from their friends and associates. I took up the story a long time ago and tracked these transgressions from day one up to the present. I watched it all happen and warned others that it would happen before it did. I did an ominous amount of work for a microscopic amount of money. When you are in that position there is simply no time for greed or corruption to kick in if the effort is to remain true and sincere. You have to always focus on the long term, the goal to take back what was stolen from all those shareholders and their families.

I've done about as good as anyone could expect of an amateur lawyer. I've come to learn a great deal about the way the legal system works and doesn't work. I've seen how the system breaks down those who aren't willing to conform to its strict guidelines and rules. You have to be willing to get a little antiquated with your format and writing style if you want to be a halfway decent attorney, and I've spent more than a few all-nighters figuring that out the hard way. Today I'm better off because I kept trying, and I have a more compelling life story as a result of this struggle, but the journey has still been painful. The fight that rages on is still stressful and agonizing. The work never seems to get any easier.

Nobody in it for the wrong reasons could ever get this far, and one day Mr. Herzog and Mr. Backman might figure that out. They can underestimate me and dismiss my efforts as confused and misdirected all they want right now, but the truth will speak for itself in the long run. I didn't do this for fame and fortune. I don't have a greedy bone in my body.

I don't work for free to stroke my ego. I don't keep plugging away for hours on end with this work thinking it's a get rich quick scheme. I don't do this because it's my job. I do it because I am proud of it, I believe in it, and nobody else is in any position to do it the right way and with the right intentions in mind. My motives are pure and my conscience is clear.

I can't pretend to know what thoughts are going through the minds of Backman and Herzog at the moment or what their actual motivations and driving factors are. However, I do know that--no matter how much better than me they think they are at lawyering--their apparent character flaws will not be washed away by technicalities and nuances of process. I will expose these flaws here and everywhere else I think it's relevant to do so, and not just because I can or I think it makes me look better in comparison. I'll do it because it needs to be done, and it's simply the right thing to do.

FERTITTAS ROAD TO BUYING THEMSELVES OUT OF BANKRUPTCY PAVED WITH BAD INTENTIONS

By: Rich Bergeron

(at left, boys will be boys..Dana White stands in the middle of the two Fertitta Brothers in their younger days. The picture on the right is from a groundbreaking ceremony, and the labels printed on the photo should be reversed)


Las Vegas truly seems like the picture of luck and promise for visitors who flock to this mecca of over the top celebration hoping to hit it big or at least come home happy. As our nation is crippled piece by piece by massive fraud and failure of proper government oversight, a place like Vegas can easily get lost in the mix. It's not so appealing anymore now that most of us can see the whole "game" is rigged simply by observing our surroundings. It's all too easy to look around and get disgusted at the excess in a place like Vegas.

The housing crisis hit Vegas hard, especially when the economy soured and people stopped coming out there and taking such lavish vacations. Even the President of the United States, Barack Obama, was telling people at one point not to blow it all in Vegas.

The Fertitta family gambled hard and fast with Station Casinos on what is called "the locals market" and lost more than a bundle. Perhaps it is a bit of Karma for all the honest folks who lost their shirts in Fertitta casinos over the years. Possibly it could be chalked up to bad luck or a lack of foresight.

Or... maybe the more feasible and probable explanation is the Fertittas and their front men and lawyers did it all on purpose. They orchestrated a bankruptcy to purposely favor their position and buy the company back debt free and scare off other bidders by their sheer ability to make impossible deals possible.

It's not so far fetched, is it? Vegas is--after all--a city where the mayor is working to build a Mob museum out of an old courthouse. When a guy like Oscar Goodman, a former Mafia lawyer himself, is running "the show," it's hard to believe everything's not rigged toward the wiseguy blood in town. One of the questions that seems pointless to ask these days is, "Where's all the money really going?"

It's just becoming increasingly harder to track and regulate where and why money gets thrown around by these professional corporate crooks who have insulated themselves with vast resources and smart attorneys who know how to get around the bankruptcy courts and keep their bosses out of getting splashed with any real hot water.

Guys like William J. Bullard become untouchable after figuring out how to get through all the loopholes and sneak past regulators looking the other way. As long as the tax money and campaign contributions are flowing out, the investigators aren't looking into the Fertitta Enterprises affairs.

One of the most troubling aspects of my investigation into Fertitta Enterprises is how little there is regarding public information about what this company actually does to make all that wheel-greasing money. A look back into some INTERESTING CASE FILES of another bankruptcy process Fertitta Enterprises is involved in reveals that Fertitta Front Man William J. Bullard was implicated in some interesting claims in a massive bankruptcy of a group of companies under the USA Capital label. Bullard is connected at the hip to the Fertitta family, having common connections to Gordon Biersch, Fertitta Enterprises, Meadows Bank (Where he is ironically the "Whistleblower Contact"), and two older businesses listed on corporationwiki.com:

Inspectech Corporation of California

Tex-Wesley Clear Creek, L.L.C.

Crooks are by nature egotistical and arrogant people. The worst crooks can be the most likely to really add insult to injury with their crimes. They do this not only by way of the sheer magnitude of the crime itself, but also by the very methods and names they use to keep the whole matter secret. Consider the "USA" connection between two groups Fertitta Enterprises and Bill Bullard worked their financial fraud through over the years. Global Cash Access (GCA) Executives were heavily involved in the Xyience bankruptcy scandal. Fertitta Enterprises officials, under the guise of a subsidiary named Zyen, LLC, utilized Global Cash Access money and some of that scandal-ridden company's principal players to perpetrate the whole fraudulent Xyience bankruptcy process from top to bottom.

One of the earliest legal problems the co-founders of GCA faced were related to companies like USA Processing and EXCLUSIVE USA MARKETING CORPORATION.

GCA Founders Karim Maskatiya & Robert Cuccinotta, Former CEO Kirk Sanford, Executive Kathryn Lever, and Maskatiya's Nephew Omer Sattar are the known Global Cash Access plants put in place at Xyience to purposely bankrupt the company and funnel all the money to Fertitta connected companies like Zuffa, LLC and Zuffa Marketing. Kirk Sanford told me himself in a November, 2007 meeting in Times Square (see photo below) that Maskatiya had a considerable amount of money invested in the Fertitta lien position over Xyience.


The major connection Global Cash Access has with Fertitta Enterprises is by way of their contract to provide kiosk and transaction services to station Casinos. This is what likely put the Fertittas in touch with GCA's executives and officials in the first place.

Looking at the emerging pattern of fraud, analyzing the complicated nature of the involved transactions, and taking into account the overall landscape in Vegas that allowed this corruption to go on unchecked, it is easy to see why the Fertittas and their front men and women continue to escape culpability and accountability for orchestrating these massive fraudulent schemes. Nobody has the budget to face them in court and win, and not even the government's best investigative agencies seem willing to try to go the criminal route. The reason doesn't appear to be lack of cause as much as it seems to be about cold hard cash. The city of Las Vegas and the State of Nevada are getting their take six ways to Sunday, and so is the U.S. Government on casino, property, and income taxes paid out by the Fertitta family and their business interests.

But, the question must be asked: WHAT IS THE PRICE OF ALLOWING THIS FRAUD TO KEEP GROWING BIGGER? Do we have to let the Fertittas turn into the next Bernie Madoff before we throw the full weight of criminal charges at them? Their "bull"dog William J. Bullard should be using his financial talents to solve complicated financial crimes. Instead, he and the Fertittas have masterminded perpetrating them under the radar and behind the scenes without ever being called out by the major local press. They do direct business with the Vegas Media Magnate Greenspuns through Green Valley Ranch and Meadows Bank. They have literally covered every base but one.

A blogger with a clear conscience and a bit of talent in getting the facts out of a dedicated investigation came along and did what nobody else had the stones to accomplish and fight for.

I learned that justice is not simply a word or a concept. It is something you must believe in and strive for every day in a society that is trying to keep you from obtaining it if it means pissing off the haves in favor of the have nots. The who cares line gets tossed out there all the time like the first pitch at any big baseball game: ugly and off target.

Who cares? For one, you should if you are a true fan of mixed martial arts. Do you really want the kind of people who systematically take over and cripple companies after promising to invest in and take care of them to be ultimately in control of the best MMA league in existence? This UFC deal is "their thing" and they have some bondholders they have to pay back over the long run, but it's going to make them rich and the fighters poor after all is said and done. They put too many fighters out of business for too long when PRIDE collapsed, going down in history as just another Fertitta company destroyed with a principal purpose of picking up the best pieces and pissing away the rest.

Do you really want the kind of guys who would pay themselves with money pumped into Xyience to the tune of millions of dollars and neglect to square up with their own fighters under contract with the brand? The best warriors in the business should be making millions, and often they make pennies compared to the hours they have to put in to be in prime condition to fight. They rely on their best sponsorships at times.

The Fertittas had outstanding contract payments owed to UFC fighters sponsored by Xyience of less than a million dollars when they bankrupted the company as the chief lienholder. Why didn't they pay their own fighters who literally shed blood for the brand? All the Fertittas ever did for the brand before they destroyed it and took it over for themselves was front it with some ad space on the octagon, make their fighters accessible to sponsorships, and associate it with the rise of The Ultimate Fighter show on Spike TV. The fighters did the real work in promoting the brand. Yet only one old-regime Xyience fighter is back with the newly-branded Fertitta outfit. Matt Serra. Why? (Search this blog for Matt Serra)

The time has come for some light to be shed on this corruption and some action to be taken by the general public. If you agree with me and have your own examples of "usual suspect" fraud that's being overlooked, please Report Waste, Fraud, Abuse, or Misconduct Here.

The Fertittas are about the buy their own casinos out of bankruptcy on a budget of nearly a billion dollars built on what appears to be scheme after corrupt scheme and ruthless business practices that take advantage of the bankruptcy process and subject far too many innocent Americans and taxpayers to footing the ultimate trickle down bill. It starts with the huge investment banks. These institutions eventually pass the expenses on to the little people through overdraft and transaction fees to catch up on all the revenue they've lost hiding their transgressions and trying to avoid being prosecuted for financial crimes.

Why should we be surprised that the economic outlook is gloomy right now in America when we let financial fraudsters like this stay in control and out of jail for so long? As the Fertitta Family pumps hundreds of millions of dollars into getting a relatively debt free casino package out of a nearly 6 billion dollar and ballooning debt debacle with Station, another old associate is going down for 8-12 years in the penitentiary. Bill Bullard was a gung-ho pit boss type of mover and shaker for the company Joseph D. Milanowski drove into the ground. His scheme with one loan in the ongoing bankruptcy case of USA Capital prompted the lawyers explaining it to draw up a diagram:



So right now one lone wolf at the tip of this iceberg gets captured and caged for a while, but the rest of the wolves get to go right on running with the pack and wreaking havoc. Station Casinos is set for auction on this fast-money-first-Friday in August, and the Fertittas are poised to put in a bid as high as $772 million according to the Wall Street Journal.

Is it any coincidence that just as the Station Casinos auction closes leaving the Fertittas virtually free and clear of all the fraud that got them there, Joe Milanowski will be settling into his cell
after having a wall of bars closed on him?

August 6, 2010 could possibly be the day the Fertitta brothers make the deal of the century for themselves. This auction is paving the way for them to become even richer in the long run if they play their cards right and nobody outbids them. August 6th could potentially be the best day of the Frank Fertitta III and Lorenzo Fertitta's young business life, but it is sure to be the worst day of Milanowski's entire life, and he had to pay nearly $90 million in restitution to boot.

Instead of raising champagne glasses to toast yet another successful scheme when they steal their company back from the bottom of the cliff of debt they pushed it off, the Fertittas should be in their own bunk bed unit across from Milanowski. Bullard should be in the bunk above Milanowski. Maybe like Tyco's Dennis Kozlowski does now, they can do something constructive like teach their fellow inmates how to get their GEDs.

Here are some interesting links on Milanowski worth looking at and asking yourself why the Fertittas and William J. Bullard aren't implicated anywhere in this mess even though the civil charges implicate them as such a major player:

MILANOWSKI PLEADS GUILTY

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 20536 / April 23, 2008

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION VS. JOSEPH MILANOWSKI COMPLAINT


ACCUSATIONS OF FRAUD, SECURITIES VIOLATIONS: SEC sues ex-USA Capital President

AND WHO GOT RICH WITHOUT SHARING ANY ACCOUNTABILITY WHATSOEVER???

THAT'S RIGHT F#*KIN' LAWYERS!!!

"The longer this thing goes on (in bankruptcy court), the more the attorneys are going to get paid," Bullard said.

USA Capital investors fret over rising legal fees

Xyience Temporarily Taps Out

XYIENCE FILES FOR BANKRUPTCY

By: Rich Bergeron


Over a month before it became official, Fight News Unlimited reported that bankruptcy was imminent for Xyience. Our article entitled THE ENRON OF MMA exposed some of the reasons why the company is in such dire straits, but the Las Vegas Review Journal dug a little deeper this week and examined the actual voluntary bankruptcy filing Xyience went forward with last Friday.

The official filing comes after an involuntary bankruptcy petition was filed on behalf of several investors tied into a lawsuit against the current Xyience regime. The petition, filed January 3rd, calls into question the Fertitta Enterprises loan and would essentially block any attempted foreclosure by the current controlling interests, and place all the assets under the court's discretion until the fight over the company is finally decided. Zyen, LLC, the company designed by Fertitta Enterprises to handle the $12,000,000 loan given to Xyience last year, filed a NOTICE OF STRICT FORECLOSURE late last year that allowed for only a 90 day window for investors to mount a fight for the company.

The LVRJ Xyience Bankruptcy article, now being circulated across the on-line MMA news landscape, dropped some major bombshells. Yet, there were some major inconsistencies that went to press in the piece, and the overall tone was extremely favorable to the current regime that is attempting to lock out hundreds of the company's initial investors.

One of the most outrageous misrepresentations of the facts reported include the following passage in the article:

"Sattar said the bankruptcy became necessary when the company was unable to raise $7.5 million more from shareholders."

This quote, coming from the lips of the company's newly-crowned president Omer Sattar, is a blatant misrepresentation of the actual situation that gave rise to the bankruptcy. Before Fertitta Enterprises provided loan capital to Xyience, a letter went out by email to a large group of shareholders telling them that if the deal was not ratified the company would go bankrupt. Once the deal was approved by less than half the shareholders, much of the Fertitta investment went right back into a hefty three-year sponsorship extension with the UFC and also helped to pay off past due sponsorship fees of approximately $6.5 million. According to the Las Vegas Review Journal the Fertittas put almost $18 million in total capital into Xyience, and a hefty chunk of that money came out of one pocket only to go right back into another, since the Fertittas are 90% owners of the UFC. Essentially, Xyience would have had double what they needed to stay in operation if they opted not to be a UFC sponsor this year to the tune of $15 million. Even with the extension in place the latest UFC sponsor (Harley Davidson) bumped Xyience from the center of the mat, and now it appears the company paid an absolutely ridiculous price to have their name on a couple cornerpads of the octagon.

The Las Vegas Review Journal is either guilty of extreme bias or sloppy reporting. Don't expect any follow up stories to question any move the Fertittas make. First of all, the Las Vegas Review Journal is partnered with The Las Vegas Sun, which is owned by the Greenspun Family. The Fertittas' Station Casinos partnered with the Greenspun Family on some notable casino developments. Aliante Station and Green Valley Ranch are both joint operations put together by these two major Vegas movers and shakers.

The Las Vegas Review Journal appears to be providing aid and comfort to their business partners in their latest struggle to save face on Xyience. The LVRJ even quoted Sattar's claims of death threats issued to Xyience officials without even contacting either of the men who reportedly made those threats in order to get a response. Ric Klingenberg was accused of making the threats along with his brother David Bergstrom. The dispute arose over a payment owed to Klingenberg's elderly mother, and both brothers were reportedly given the run around while trying to secure a check for $20,000. Reached by phone recently, Klingenberg categorically denied the description of the events Sattar presented in the voluntary bankruptcy filings.

"I went to that office, that part's true, but we didn't storm in there," said Klingenberg. "And we didn't threaten anybody's lives. We did go in and close the door, because, isn't that what you do when you have a meeting?" Klingenberg said Xyience CFO Michael Levy promised him his mother would get paid when the Fertitta Enterprises loan came through. He also said he left Levy a phone message telling him when he would be there to collect the check. Levy reportedly told Klingenberg his mother "was going to have a Merry Christmas" in late December.

"Voices were raised, and everyone was talking at once," said Klingenberg. "We were told to go find Adam Frank, because he was the only one who could authorize a check." He was later told he'd need to get an attorney in order to collect the funds.

Klingenberg also claims that Sattar lied as far as the bankruptcy. "They didn't file bankruptcy, we did," he said. Klingenberg's family trust is the main plaintiff in the investor suit under which the involuntary bankruptcy petition was filed. He explained that the company's hand was forced by their initial filing.

In the aftermath of the bankruptcy announcement, it now appears the bad press and the legal battles mounting have forced the company to now explore the possibility of selling the whole operation. A follow up article in the LVRJ reports that financing has been approved to help position the company for a sale even while the legal battles for control of Xyience rage on.

The Fertittas have not provided any published comment on their tactics regarding Xyience, leaving President Omer Sattar to provide the company's perspective to the public. Sattar is part of a group that came in to run Xyience from a company called Global Cash Access. Questions surrounding insider trading charges and a late filing of GCA's third-quarter report for 2007 followed the departure of the GCA contingent that is now operating Xyience. GCA's stock plummeted in November of 2007 and has yet to completely recover. Station Casinos was one of GCA's largest accounts, so it appears that the partnership between former GCA employees and Fertitta Enterprises stems from that initial connection.

Although the UFC continues to operate as the top dog in the Mixed Martial Arts industry, this latest debacle with Xyience and some other recent developments point to a rocky future for the pioneers of the sport. While other leagues are constantly looking for ways to co-promote major events, the UFC continues to refuse to even acknowledge that any other league competes with them. Their lawsuit against Randy Couture is also looming as a large distraction. On top of that, Tito Ortiz is planning to leave the organization after his next fight according to mmapayout.com. While Ortiz has never been one to hold his tongue about his frustrations with Dana White, he has also never been as popular as he is now with MMA fans. As the boyfriend of Pornstar Jenna Jameson and a contestant on the celebrity edition of the Apprentice, Ortiz is at the height of his fame right now. Wherever he goes from here, that league is sure to benefit from his star status while other UFC fighters will take note and might decide to follow his lead when their own contracts run out.

The UFC seems to be having enough growing pains without their principal owners getting heavily involved in a company with such a horrible reputation. Much of the mainstream MMA press reporting on this story of Xyience going bankrupt have just now started asking questions about what's really going on. The question on everyone's mind seems to be: "Why would the Fertittas want to buy into their own sponsor?" We're talking about a huge , profit-driven company here. Fertitta Enterprises is not the kind of outfit you'd expect to touch Xyience with a ten-foot pole. Yet, here they are up to their necks in debt and tied in to the point where they seem to be more willing to cut their losses than actually rebuild the brand. So, what's the motive. Well, you simply have to go back in time a bit to find the answer. We put together an in-depth report over a month ago that outlined how this day would come.

The truth is, the Fertittas never intended to restore the dignity of the company and save the day for the shareholders who built Xyience. If that was their plan, they'd be front and center in the press talking about it. Instead, they're hiding behind straws put in place to act as the fall guys. If they really wanted to clean the slate and keep the company in full operation, they would have tried to secure more financing a long time ago. They would have put the company first. Instead, they immediately signed a contract extension with the UFC as soon as they put their money in. The whole thing just stinks.

This whole bankruptcy fiasco has nothing to do with not having the money to prevent it. If they don't have it, they can certainly get it. The real reason they decided to file bankruptcy is so they can lock out an estimated 380 shareholders who built and sustained this brand even while fraud and corruption were tearing the company apart from within. Just when these folks were told their payday was on the horizon and there could be an IPO as early as this month, these investors are now forced to reclaim their interest in the company through litigation that could last years. Some of them have lost their life savings.

I have run into a lot of MMA fans who read my stories and other stories about Xyience's issues and ask, "Who cares?" They wonder why it's a story at all and who's the victim. The Enron, Tyco, and Worldcom scandals have tempered the American public to such an extent that we seem to expect this kind of back room underhandedness and duplicity. In one case I found a thread where one fan actually praised the Fertittas for the way they rigged their own loan by investing in Xyience.

Yet, there is so much about this story that people should care about. Let's just go back in time again to when Xyience was at the height of its popularity. All kinds of fighters were raking in big sponsorships. GNC agreed to take on a wide array of Xyience products. The Xyience commercials were a viral video hit because of the sexy models drinking Xenergy in them. Hundreds of investors had the feeling that they could depend on this thing becoming really big. Xyience was a big ticket sponsor at a time when fighters were getting paid chump change compared to boxers. Most fighters are still reliant on sponsors, and they will be until the sport gets sanctioned in more states and becomes more of a mainstream draw. In the wake of this huge scandal that now enters Chapter 11 (pun intended), it's clear there's no other sponsor that's going to equal what Xyience was doing in the beginning. Harley Davidson is not out sponsoring all kinds of fighters. You won't find the Lumber Liquidators logo on any fighter's shorts.

The bottom line is a lot of people got screwed so the Fertittas and Dana White could get themselves a fat dividend check. They laid waste to PRIDE first, and now they're focused on Xyience. Every step of the way they've lied to the public about what they were going to do. They said they were going to keep PRIDE going only to let it completely dissolve with no hope for ressurection. Investors in Xyience were told that the Fertitta deal was the only option and they had to do the deal or watch the company go bankrupt. They did the deal, and the company is still going bankrupt. The Xyience mouthpieces working on behalf of the Fertittas said they were going to reorganize Xyience and keep the brand going only to now come out and announce plans to sell it. It's sad that some people out there are willing to chalk all that up as good business sense.

In the end UFC fighters continue to get paid a fraction of what they should for the risks they take. Some great organizations rose and fell because of greed. Honest investors were shafted because the rich wanted to get richer. And we wonder why the economy is in shambles. Look around. People constantly get away with this kind of shady behavior simply because so many of us shrug our shoulders and say, "Who cares?"

As for who's the victim here, it's anybody and everybody who thinks there's nothing wrong with this picture. It's all the folks who choose to look the other way because great fights are still getting made. It's all the legions of brainwashed sheep who refuse to open their minds to the possibility that they're being lied to. It's all the screwed investors and all the fighters being used while their bosses are raking in all the big money. If this kind of behavior is allowed to go on unchecked, everyone loses.