Showing posts with label Culinary Union. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Culinary Union. Show all posts

Monday, February 17, 2020

Frank and Lorenzo Fertitta Face Their Worst Nightmare as the Culinary Union Takes Center Stage in National Democratic Primary Picture

By: Rich Bergeron

This Saturday Nevada will caucus to determine how many delegates will go to which candidates running as Democrats in the 2020 race for the White House. The most significant political force to weigh in on who should get the ultimate nod on this special day for national politics will be Local 226, The Culinary Union.

This reality is much to the chagrin of a common enemy I share with this particular union, Billionaire Brothers and Sophisticated Scam Artists Lorenzo Fertitta and Frank Fertitta III. Suddenly the blackjack tables are turned in Las Vegas. It used to be the Fertittas wielding power over the union, refusing to acknowledge stringent efforts to unionize their casino chain. Station Casinos, AKA Red Rock Resorts is now losing the fight. The Culinary crew is infiltrating one Station establishment after another.

The Palms Casino, the latest acquisition for Station Casinos, is one of the last bastions of union resistance. The Fertittas already sunk hundreds of millions of dollars into upgrading this casino, and the culinary union fight actually resulted in the threat of financial kickbacks from the government getting jammed up by congressional democrats. Prior to the vote this Saturday, some democratic candidates for president may actually even join the picket line at The Palms and herald the Culinary Union effort to grab another piece of the Fertitta casino empire's pie.  

This is a nasty fight, one that countless union dues have gone toward waging relentlessly over the years since I began investigating the Fertittas for their shady involvement in the Xyience scandal. I've actually personally been interviewed at length by Culinary Union researchers on multiple occasions. Much of the information they put on their anti-Fertitta Web-sites originated with my reporting here and simply expanded on that work. At one point this fight was so fierce that the union resorted to what I saw as a sick and twisted campaign to make fighters in the UFC (also owned by the Fertittas at the time) believe that this same union would step up and stand up for their rights to fair treatment, too. The culinary union put up a Web-site pointing to a potential effort to organize fighters but never really bothered to make any legitimate foray into that realm. It was a bluff I personally blasted in an article on Rant Sports.

Now that the Fertittas are out of the fighting business altogether, I can look at this union a bit more objectively and perhaps forgive them for biting off more than they could chew years ago. After all, their people definitely picked up where I left off with exposing these spoon-fed crooks moonlighting as successful self-made men.

If you wonder just how much this feud is hurting the brothers and their casino investors, consider the moves they've made recently to pump up the stock with personal investments from family trusts and the suggested selling of senior notes to raise $750 million. They are even shopping around property they own to pay down some of the massive debt they've incurred. The fact that this company once again left the veil of private ownership and became a public entity did not stop the managing interests from tainting the brand with their financial tricks.

The Palms project alone comes in at an expense of nearly $1 billion if the cost of the purchase is included. This gamble will really have to pay off, and they will have to pinch every penny moving forward to survive an ongoing battle like this with the likes of the Culinary Union. Only the infusion of their own personal capital staved off a completely negative trend in the Red Rock Resorts stock that saw more investors losing shares than acquiring them last year. That money was not even really all that important to the Fertitta brothers themselves. It was more like a raiding of the piggy bank where they keep the future inheritance their children will enjoy someday. All of the funds came from trusts, not really out of the personal coffers they covet and hide in multiple business entities like "Fertitta Capital" and "Fertitta Enterprises."

The Culinary Union is in this for keeps, and now they are clearly at a tipping point ahead of this caucus. There is no doubt the Fertittas and their friends will be flooding Donald Trump and the rest of his party representatives with donations to stave off a Democrat takeover after the 2020 general election. If the United States decides to elect a Democrat as president, the Fertittas will likely get out of the casino business as fast as they possibly can. The union takeover will be all but inevitable.

Already the pressure is becoming unbearable as there is no stone left unturned in the fight to expose the Fertittas as frauds. At one point Station Casinos was voted by workers as one of the best places to work in Nevada, but these days Culinary folks are alleging that the chain is an unsafe working environment that OSHA should investigate. It's hard not to look back at this very moment on the tumultuous bankruptcy the chain escaped virtually unscathed. Billions of dollars in debt were erased. The amount of money spent on "going big" with The Palms may come back to haunt the company. This is especially true since there is such a focus on art involved in the $690 million overhaul. The Fertittas have not had the best luck in the art world. Frank Fertitta III once bought what was later determined to be a fake Mark Rothko painting. He paid a whopping $7.2 million for the con in the classic case of a swindler who got a taste of his own medicine. Lawsuits helped him recover the money he lost, but it was still an indicator of how the brothers often spend their income recklessly and don't use the best judgment in business decisions.

It is no surprise then that there are rumors that the Fertittas want a way out of the casino business, and they may choose the path of a complete sell-off. Only a few properties would remain under their control in that scenario, namely The Palms and Palace Station. It would also take a monumental effort to do this kind of transaction under public ownership if it doesn't represent an instant and significant benefit for all current investors.

There is also still tremendous buzz about the Fertitta brothers being interested in owning an NFL team, which would likely depend on a major sale like what I described above. Still, I would not offer any odds on that prospect unless they ingratiate themselves with a more wholesome group of partners to make the deal. As is, they are barely suitable to be given a gaming license in any state. Their connection to various cases of corruption, scandal, fraud and abuse of the bankruptcy laws is telling. They cannot run from their history, as this recent Chicago Tribune article explains. The National Football League would be wise to keep them far away from any team ownership position.

As for this weekend's caucus efforts, look for the Culinary Union to take advantage of the spotlight that will be on Las Vegas and Station Casinos on Saturday. Regardless of whether or not the Democrats have any chance to unseat Trump, the Culinary Union will continue to fight for better treatment of their workers. Their momentum is palpable, and their influencing power is potent. For once in their lives, it may actually be time for the Fertitta brothers to play nice and surrender in this war of attrition. They will only hurt themselves and their investors in the long run if they keep butting heads with this growing political force. Financial losses can be recovered, but reputational damage is typically more permanent.






Friday, February 26, 2016

IP NO: Station Casinos, AKA Red Rock Resorts (RRR) Not Worth The Investment

By: Rich Bergeron

LOOKING OUT FOR NUMBER ONE

Frank and Lorenzo Fertitta were set to make out like bandits, raiding their cash cow corporation once again for a massive amount of funds with a single scheme. The "Red Rock Resorts" IPO was the talk of the town and Wall Street for a little while, but the brothers pulled back at the last second after feeling the shellshock of heavy market losses in late January.

Anyone who might be thinking about investing in this latest Fertitta financial scheme should also pull back.

This IPO debacle is par for the Fertitta course. If you know the real history of the Fertitta family, you know these folks are the type of people who ruthlessly screw over other people to make all their money. From the card tables to the boardroom, the Fertitta brothers have a knack for separating honest people from their savings and fortunes.

The only "offering" the public really gets in buying Red Rock Resorts stock is an offer to help the Fertitta brothers set themselves and their kids up with more voluminous, ridiculous, ludicrous wealth. And at the end of the day, the Fertittas will still run the whole Station Casinos show. And when the Fertittas run the show, history proves that they always pay themselves first.

According to BloodyElbow.com, the main beneficiaries of a Red Rock Resorts IPO would be two generations of the Fertitta family:

"...all net proceeds will go towards reorganizing the corporate structure, including an acquisition of Fertitta Entertainment LLC. It's expected that Frank and Lorenzo Fertitta will each take home $112.5 million while trusts for their six children will receive $53 million. Additional stock sales included in the IPO could net the brothers even more."

Obviously, I have my own reasons for not trusting the Fertittas. They spent an awful lot of money on lawyers trying to prove they had nothing to do with the bogus $25 million suit against me that I successfully defeated over the course of six years of representing myself in their home courts. Yet, at the same time, the injunctions secured against me prevented me from writing the truth at the beginning of that case. That allowed the Fertittas to take Xyience out from under all the honest investors in the company who thought the Fertittas would help the company and set them all up for life once the long-awaited Xyience IPO came around.

Instead of the Fertittas doing the right thing, they used fall guys to take care of themselves and stole Xyience with what the bankruptcy trustee called a "loan to own" scheme. The casino barons simply pumped a little money into their shady acquisition, sat on their stolen nest egg for a few years, and sold the whole operation off to a Texas company for way more than it was worth.

BUYER BEWARE

Wall Street regulators and speculators would also be naive to forget that Station Casinos went public before, only to find a way to allegedly underbid shareholders in reclaiming the brand as a private corporation a few years later. This is not to mention all the other small maneuvers and manipulations pulled off by these casino barons to line their own pockets and take care of their friends and family.

Dig just beneath the surface of the amusement park the Fertittas built over the bodies of their financial kills, and you will find enough skeletons to fill a cemetery. Rather than physical bodies that an "old school" mobster might leave, these new school gangsters leave broken hopes and dreams, other people paying their tabs and countless fighters on the UFC roster who are constantly and consistently underpaid and under-appreciated if they fail to "put on a show." Even banks end up feeling screwed over after agreeing to do business with these brothers and their associates.

The Fertittas and Station Casinos have a lengthy history of being involved in deals that allegedly favor them (and their friends and relatives) only to degrade and devalue their distant or direct partners at the same time. To call them duplicitous is too nice in this context, and to call them devious is also too much of a compliment. Yet, throughout the patterns of their business transactions, they seem to leave a ton of people on the other end feeling cheated, right down to the casino patrons who get comped by management just so they can lose their life savings trying to win back what's already lost. "The house always wins" is a concept that is well known and fabulously executed in the Fertitta family business acumen. Just take a gander at their litigation history:

Lawsuit over 2001 "sweetheart deal" (Station Casinos made $1.7 million on sale to former executive and family friend Blake Sartini):

"Station Casinos failed to negotiate the sale of Southwest Gaming to [Blake] Sartini at arm's length, according to the suit. The company also failed to appoint a committee of independent directors to negotiate the deal or retain a financial valuation expert to determine whether the terms of the sale were fair to the company, the suit said. The board also failed to seek independent, third-party bidders for Southwest Gaming or otherwise shop around the company for the highest possible price, it said."  

Back in 1998, investors accused Station Casinos principals of wasting company assets by paying a $54 million "breakup fee" to Crescent Real Estate Equities. Crescent, owned by billionaire Richard Rainwater, initially agreed to pay $1.7 billion to acquire the locals casino chain, but the deal went sour. The resulting fallout culminated with a federal lawsuit. Instead of getting roughly $18 per share in a buyout by Crescent, Station Casinos investors obviously felt shafted in having to foot the bill for another Fertitta family financial flop.

Station Casinos ended their first stint as a publicly traded company with a $5.77 billion buyout in 2007, which resulted in another slew of investor lawsuits. A few years, and around $6.5 billion in debt accumulation followed before the Fertittas put the chain through a very favorable bankruptcy process. As Donald Trump admitted to doing during his recent presidential run, the Fertittas "took advantage of the laws" in buying the bulk of the company's assets back on the other side of the bankruptcy (with the help of Deutsche Bank) for pennies on the dollar ($772 million).

The bankruptcy process victimized a long list of people (including a Texas Teachers' Pension Fund) who put money on the prospect of the Fertitta brothers building the brand into a bigger entity than their founding father Frank Junior could have ever imagined. Bondholders left in the cold by the massive bankruptcy filing sued, looking back at that 2007 leveraged buyout as the beginning of the end for the company. They filed their claims before the bankruptcy became imminent:

"The ... defendants are not acting gentlemanly,’’ the lawsuit charges. The suit alleges: "The exchange offers unfairly, disloyally and without bondholders’ consent, deny plaintiff and the entire class of similarly situated bondholders the ability to take advantage of the bond tender offers. Plaintiffs’ bond holdings will be subordinated to the newly issued bonds and, as a result, will likely be rendered worthless as the specter of Station Casinos’ insolvency approaches.’’

According to bankruptcy paperwork, the bondholders also made serious accusations that the Fertittas and their partners engaged in insider dealing with the buyout in 2007:

The buyout cost Station Casinos $4.17 billion in costs to purchase stock and incur new debt of $1.6 billion.
The filing says the buyout provided approximately $500 million in payments for insiders, nearly $300 million of which went to the Fertittas, including Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Frank Fertitta III and brother and Vice Chairman Lorenzo Fertitta. The insiders' ownership stake rose to 25 percent. 

The Xyience bankruptcy suspiciously went down under "Fertitta Enterprises" ownership just before Station Casinos officially declared bankruptcy. It appeared like the Fertittas were testing the waters by casually steering a canoe down the bankruptcy river first, waving on the giant paddleboat to follow.

At some point it seems like this family figured out that making money off their various schemes required having really great lawyers on hand to fight inevitable lawsuits, get around business and financing laws, and avoid the loss of their gaming licenses. After all, associations with criminals or criminal enterprises are supposed to disqualify certain individuals from even being involved in gaming:

Nevada Revised Statutes NRS463.0129 state: “The continued growth and success of gaming is dependent upon public confidence and trust…that gaming is free from criminal and corruptive elements.”

It's hard to believe these brothers could ever be involved in gaming when you consider their involvement in the USA Capital scandal. The former President and COO of that company earned a 12-year prison sentence for fraud perpetrated there. Some of that fraudulent activity allowed the Fertittas to benefit directly through shady loan schemes providing millions in capital to Fertitta Enterprises. Fertitta Enterprises GM Bill Bullard was a gung-ho, pit-boss-type of mover and shaker for USA Capital before Joseph Milanowski's fraud brought the company crashing down. 

According to the Las Vegas Review Journal: "The Fertitta family, founder of Station Casinos in Las Vegas, had $17 million invested in USA Capital and got it all back when one of their attorneys was on the oversight committee...The attorney then resigned from the committee." One scheme Bullard orchestrated prompted lawyers to draw up a diagram to explain it:
   
Bullard was even audacious enough to address company investors and tell them: "The longer this thing goes on (in bankruptcy court), the more the attorneys are going to get paid." 

Deutsche Bank, one of the main partners in the current Station Casinos conglomerate, is also facing recent scrutiny for alleged illegal dealings. The bank agreed last year to pay more than $2 billion in penalties to US and British authorities after admitting to rigging global interest rates. Deutsche Bank is also the subject of two ongoing criminal investigations in the United States. The bank is also facing allegations of supporting the money laundering activities of Russian clients.

On top of all this, the Fertittas willfully supported the violation of federal gaming laws by allowing "Full Tilt Poker" to advertise in association with UFC events. These in-cage and on-screen plugs obviously sent more customers to a Web-site that was not only shut down for operating illegally in the United States, but it was also later determined to be a Ponzi Scheme. The Fertittas, who also pursued online gambling through legal channels in the wake of the poker site crackdown, obviously should have known Full Tilt was always operating outside of federal gambling laws. Ray Bitar, one of the founders of Full Tilt Poker, struck a deal on various charges in 2013 that included bank fraud, money laundering and illegal gambling. Station Casinos principals and a few of their associates launched "Ultimate Poker" the same year Bitar made that last deal.  

The arrest of Bitar in 2011 also came at a time when the UFC was working on a deal to double down on their sponsorship arrangement with Full Tilt Poker. Reports in the wake of the Full Tilt bust additionally indicated that Station Casinos had their own plans to unite with Full Tilt in anticipation of favorable federal regulation regarding online gaming. Instead, Station Casinos tried and failed to do it themselves with Ultimate Poker. Even as the first and only operator in the niche for a short while, the profits made by Ultimate Poker were scarce, especially since only Nevada residents could legally use the site. 

During the Xyience debacle, the Fertittas also had peculiar connections to people disgraced by a scandal at Global Cash Access. One of the GCA flunkies, Kirk Sanford, ended up being the co-CEO of Xyience during a time when the company's collapse was inevitable. I had a meeting with Sanford and the other co-CEO Adam Frank before UFC 78: Validation in Newark, New Jersey. The two executives authorized full payment for my trip from Cape Cod, Massachusetts to meet with them and talk about the future in New York City just before the event in November of 2007. 

During that fateful sit-down, Sanford consistently maintained that the plan for Xyience was to go "scorched earth" on the investors. He also indicated this was the direction the Fertittas wanted to go with the situation. Throughout the holiday season that year, the supplement company that helped put the UFC on the map laid off multiple employees on the way to a particularly ugly bankruptcy, which was purposely orchestrated by the principals at Fertitta Enterprises. 

THE STATION CASINOS AND UFC UNION FIGHT

The Culinary Union in Las Vegas managed to emerge in recent years as particularly sharp thorns in the side of the Fertittas, thanks in part to their wing of researchers and writers outlining the shady history and strange bedfellows associated with Station Casinos. The union also famously contacted performers scheduled to come to Red Rock Casinos and discouraged them from doing so, among many other public protests and stunts. Now, the union is even trying to shut down the latest Station Casinos IPO attempt.

Their tactics of relentless and expensive campaigns to degrade the opposition begs the question: why would you want to work--even under favorable union conditions--for such underhanded individuals and their manipulative, wheel-greasing friends? I imagine the answer is the same one given by Willie Sutton when someone asked him why he robbed banks: "Because that's where the money is." UFC President Dana White responded to union attacks once by claiming the Station Casinos union deal would represent a $10 million per-year benefit for the culinary union itself.

I even wrote an article myself at one point wondering aloud why the union would squawk so much about the rights of UFC fighters if they weren't doing anything to actually create a fighters' union. Though some recent anti-trust suits against the UFC are working their way through the courts, these are being brought by fighters on the roster. The Culinary attacks on the UFC came out of left field in the context of what they were trying to do with organizing Station Casinos. My article basically asked the union bosses to put up or shut up in a little more nuanced terms. Much to my surprise, the union did make a play to attract interest in the fighter union concept last year, but not much has been done since then to make the dream a reality beyond a Web-site with no recent updates:

Fighters Agenda


The way the UFC brass treats some fighters and the poor pay rate prospects earn leaves too many competitors paying out of their own pockets to compete as professionals. Bills and expenses can bleed a fighter dry of any potential profits, and the lifelong negative effects of the injuries and stress of intense training and physical combat can be debilitating after retirement. The message sent by the UFC to many of their most hard-working young fighters is callous: working hard at your craft is worthless to your bosses if you can't entertain the fans when you step into the cage at an official UFC event. In the old school days of the Wild West, this mentality is the equivalent of the villain making his victim dance by shooting bullets at his feet. It was put on a show or die back then, and it's put on a show or forget about making a decent living now.

DON'T BUY IT!

The Fertittas have become exceedingly talented when it comes to putting on a "show" of their own. They pretend to be honest, upstanding citizens in the public eye while behind the scenes they keep ruining lives as a means of lining their own pockets. The Red Rock Resorts IPO is yet another example of the Fertitta family making it look like they want to help other people make money when it's really their own bottom line they are ultimately and primarily concerned about.

As long as this family is involved as managing partners of this proposed RRR stock, they are free to execute the same scams and schemes they've used in the past to unjustly enrich themselves. My guess, based on years of investigation into Fertitta dealings, is that this family will make sure in the end that they will collect the highest dividends, even if the stock itself ends up being worth less than the paper it's printed on. That's how they roll, and the evidence and history doesn't lie.

Friday, May 13, 2011

UFC and Station Casinos Facing New Battles

By: Rich Bergeron

The UFC and Station Casinos have both been making headline news over the past few weeks. The two entities typically keep their operations wholly unique without any major overlap. Yet, in many ways these two companies with brothers Lorenzo and Frank Fertitta III at the helm have been suffering from some of the same woes. While the brass at Station Casinos grapple with local Culinary Union workers and a massive National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Complaint against the casino chain, the UFC recently held a fighter summit at Red Rock Casino (A Station Casino property) and announced measures that appear designed to make sure a fighter's union never materializes. The unspoken message to the MMA practitioners in attendance seemed to say to all of them that the one thing UFC definitely doesn't stand for is Union Friendly Company.

As far as Station Casinos and their union troubles, it seems that they literally have no defense in the NLRB case. Casino brass recently brought back two employees fired for union organization efforts in what looks like a clear surrender, potentially opening the door to further appeasement efforts. Culinary Workers Union President Geoconda Arguello-Kline pointed out recently that the "We love Locals" motto of Station Casinos comes across as slick and disingenuous due to how the company's been treating their union-friendly staff over the years. Arguello-Kline explained, “It is truly alarming that a company which claims to love locals has had the federal government step in to ensure that workers are not retaliated against for exercising their rights under federal labor laws.”

Culinary Local 226 has been anything but quiet about their concerns, and their president seems to have a point about the casino chain's company slogan hiding the real issues related to attempts to unionize. After all, the most recent union protest on March 24, 2011 inspired a response from the company that included rolling out a chain of three "We Love Locals" billboard trucks to mask a 1,000-member, two-mile march from union headquarters to Palace Station. 100 of those 1,000 "Locals" were arrested for trying to block the entrance of the casino during the protest.





Whatever happens with the NLRB complaint, it seems highly unlikely that any company executives responsible for the anti-labor climate at Stations will leave their offices in handcuffs. Like the fat cats on Wall Street who saw their companies pay fines their personal, irresponsible behavior inspired, the most culpable company employees at Station Casinos will probably get off with no real punishment at all. Ths is despite the fact that the original 166-count complaint featured charges of threats, intimidation, interrogation, surveillance, bribery, discouragement, discrimination, discipline and even physical assault to thwart workers efforts to form a union. Yet, any resolution of these disturbing issues is most likely to involve the company being forced to pay fines and institute changes that will make it easier for workers to organize without repurcussions and retaliation.

Station Casinos was once labeled as one of the 100 best companies to work for by Fortune Magazine. Yet, despite the union issues and a highly contentious bankruptcy process, the Fertitta brothers remain high on another important list. Both Lorenzo and Frank Fertitta III had no trouble making the Forbes list again this year with both said to be worth around a cool billion. Though they slipped a few spots in the heirarchy of that rich list, the favorable outcome to the bankruptcy put nearly all of their financially-stressed properties back under their control. They even went on a hiring spree and launched a huge giveaway of cars and cash before instituting reorganization plans revealing they might not even end up paying for most of what they gave away to generate business.

It's hard to believe this is the same company that at one point planned to build a $10 billion development featuring three hotels and casinos at the site of the Wild Wild West motel and casino on Tropicana Avenue and Interstate 15. (concept photo at left)

The project also reportedly included a possible plan to place an arena on site. The concept was even championed by a Deutsche Bank official, which is ironic considering that's one of the same institutions now left holding the bag for a great deal of the casino chain's massive debt load. That huge amount of Station Casinos debt that led to the company's bankruptcy was racked up and steadily growing out of control long before the "Viva" resort plans hit the presses. Just acquiring the target land area for the proposed--and now likely doomed--development cost the Fertittas $335 million over a ten-year span.

Considering the completely irresponsible handling of the company's business by the Fertitta Brothers, it's no surprise that their lenders are now challenging the family's buyback of Green Valley Ranch for $500 million, which would eliminate $378 million in debt. It seems to be perfect timing considering the UFC, owned by the same Fertitta brothers, is flying high enough to help out with some of the big ticket buybacks of these highly-distressed properties. The UFC's success has been so pronounced that there was even enough cash flow to buy the next best fight league on the market. To keep the UFC gravy train flowing, though, it's going to take more than the acquisition of a major competitor like Strikeforce.

To really take heed of the lessons learned by Station Casinos' union struggles and bankruptcy, the Fertittas will have to focus more on saving money than spending it when it comes to operating the UFC. Though there is no current fighter union taking shape at this point, some recent decisions made by UFC brass indicate that it's something the organization seems concerned about. It can't help that one of their Strikeforce stars, Nick Diaz, is working on scheduling a boxing match with Jeff Lacy this fall. So, fighter payment is sure to take center stage as a contentious issue that must be dealt with soon if the Fertittas and Dana White intend to avoid the formation of any union.

The UFC took the first step in the union-prevention direction by announcing a new accident insurance offering designed to assist fighters who suffer injuries during training. The news came at a time when the injury bug hit the league square in the face after two marquee fighters (Frankie Edgar and Gray Maynard) wound up having to pull out of their main event fight scheduled for UFC 130. Frankie Edgar's broken ribs and Gray Maynard's busted knee will be taken care of under the new plan. Prior to the additional coverage being offered, fighters were only insured by the league for actual fight injuries. Outside of training injuries, fighters will also enjoy benefits if they are involved in non-training accidents that require medical treatment.

Still, other developments in the sport recently seem to point to a potential need for even more coverage for unforseen health circumstances fighters may face. Bryan Baker's proposal to his girlfriend at a Bellator event recently paled in comparison to the news of what he had to fight through to get to that point. A Dave Meltzer report in the wake of the engagement story sweeping the Internet also revealed Baker's battle with Leukemia and how he concealed the cancer diagnosis through three competitive fights. Brock Lesnar's bouts with Diverticulitis are also making waves lately, and the condition led Lesnar to back out of a planned match-up with Junior Dos Santos. Though many reports since the latest TUF coach fight was called off speculate on whether this could lead to Brock's retirement, nobody seems to be asking whether or not the UFC should be helping him with his medical bills. If they expect him to toe the company line in his post-fight speeches and keep him from making any return appearances with the WWE, what's so outrageous about expecting the league to step up and take care of his health woes? Of course, Lesnar might not be the best example since he is such a huge draw and one of the most well-paid fighters in the UFC. He's not likely struggling to pay his outside health insurance premiums, and it's not as if he's forced to turn to Obamacare to get by. Still, if it can happen to a guy like him who's been an athlete nearly all his life and is the picture of fitness, it can really happen to anyone. If the new plan doesn't cover these types of unforseen circumstances, it is probably only a matter of time before that type of insurance will prove essential.

Providing all fighters comprehensive health and dental benefits is just one way to stave off the formultion of any fighter's union. Another method utilized recently by Dana White involves demonizing union efforts and painting the Culinary Union's parent company (UNITE HERE) as the enemy to furthering the acceptance of the sport in a key state. White made headlines recently after calling attention to "union idiots" in New York spending money to oppose MMA's regulation there. UNITE HERE is lobbying against the sport in New York state due to multiple issues unions typically work to address on behalf of their members. A memo, put out by UNITE HERE members and mentioned in the above-linked story, points to problems specifically caused by the "near monopoly" the UFC created by purchasing Strikeforce.

Fighter pay and contract issues do seem to be legitimate reasons for UNITE HERE's opposition to MMA, though the Station Casinos case against the Culinary Union is also clearly an indirect contributor. The UFC and Station Casinos often neglect to keep their businesses from overlapping, so it's no coincidence Red Rock Casino hosted the most recent fighter summit that sought to quell many of the issues calling attention to the potential need for a fighters' union. It's also no coincidence that the same Fertitta brothers who don't seem to want their casinos to become union shops are also concerned enough to make moves that give the impression that they care about their UFC fighters as much as any fighters' union would.

The official UFC response to UNITE HERE's opposition (see above-linked article) cites the many union-friendly companies who are both employed by and benefit from UFC events and business practices. This is the "ultimate" height of hypocrisy that seems to be saying on one hand it's OK to support unions under certain circumstances while on the other hand the UFC brass makes every effort to avoid a fighters' union penetrating the organization and the UFC's majority owners don't even mount a defense to a sweeping civil indictment of their union-busting tactics at Station Casinos.

New York Assemblyman Bob Reilly was already a staunch opponent of MMA's regulation in New York state before hearing Dana White's "union idiots" chatter after UFC 129. Since Reilly admittedly received many donations over the years from various unions, he was obviously offended by White's union bashing and attempts to link the Culinary Union issue to the regulation debate. The fact is, since White's tirade against the Culinary Union the UFC brass seem much more concerned than they ever were before about unions, their power to negotiate, and the concept of losing the battle against union related issues plaguing their organization to the point where a fighters' union becomes inevitable.

One issue also plaguing the UFC of late has nothing to do with unions, but it could prove to be more damaging to the league than contract or insurance issues could ever be. Chael Sonnen's recent indefinite suspension by the California State Athletic Commission calls attention once again to the Steroids issue that cast a pall over other sports like Baseball in recent years. The prosecution of Barry Bonds illustrated that the government takes the issue of lying about steroid use seriously enough to spend more on that case than it has in pursuing many perpetrators of massive fraud on Wall Street. A recent report citing the United States Anti-Doping Agency's criticism of the UFC's drug testing policies raises some serious questions. Situations like Chael Sonnen's pathetic "hyper Gonadism" excuse for injecting 4 times the legal limit of Testosterone before his fight with Anderson Silva would have and should have encouraged a more involved investigation by the UFC itself if they indeed were intent on keeping Steroids out of the league. Instead, it appears that the UFC's casual attitude toward Sonnen's attempt to find a loophole to break the rules forced the CSAC to attempt to right that wrong for them.

Tyler Tygart, chief of the United States Anti-Doping Agency, advocates more stringent testing for steroids, and he points out that the UFC brass is engaging high-powered lawyers to argue against blood testing. The different regulatory bodies in the many locales the UFC travels to often have exclusive rules when it comes to testing for performance enhancing drugs. Some venues allow the UFC to do their own testing, which could create a look-the-other way climate for certain cards. Essentially, the UFC brass could decide to accept or act indifferently to PED use in the name of getting more exciting performances out of their fighters. There are already accusations that cards in Nevada (Where the UFC's parent company Zuffa and Station Casinos are both based) offer far less stringent testing than states like California. It seems that far more fighters who are caught in positive drug tests after fights are nabbed outside of Nevada even though the UFC has gone to great lengths to promote a high number of cards in their home state. Former Nevada State Athletic Commission officials are entrenched in the UFC, including Lorenzo Fertitta, who is one of the company's majority owners and also a former commissioner.

If any major government investigation on PEDs infiltrates UFC fighter circles and takes aim at Nevada in particular, the results could be extremely damaging. Union concerns and fighters like Nick Diaz turning to boxing for a better payday could wind up being small potatoes if that happens. The sad fact is the UFC brass, particularly the Fertittas, are used to both getting their way in their home state and throwing money around to get their way when they need to solve problems away from home. Once a major investigatory agency decides to dig deeper and refuses to allow money to trump justice, all the corrupt and subversive tactics the league's bigwigs have been getting away with could all come crashing down on their heads.

Don't forget the recent busts involving online casino giants like PokerStars.Com, which the UFC's majority owners just made a huge deal with not long after taking over Strikeforce. Strikeforce once counted PokerStars as a major sponsor, and that relationship opened the door for Station Casinos to negotiate an agreement to work together with PokerStars in lobbying efforts to legalize online gambling in Nevada. When government agencies stepped in and took over the online gambling entities, the Fertittas backed off their deal. The fact that the Fertittas didn't get deeply involved enough to be embroiled in the money-laundering and other accusations facing the online casinos was perhaps their first close call in what could be more major legal issues in the future if the next time they don't happen to be so lucky.